From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <wwgrol@PSESERV3.FW.HAC.COM>
Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry
Date: 1996/11/27
Message-ID: <9611271422.AA04243@most>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201074476
sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU>
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


:> > [5] GM implementation and test procedures are arcane (at best) and often
:> >     self-defeating. Rigorous test consists of getting in a car and seeing
:> >     if anything happens.

Having owned a few GM cars and driven even more, I can't excape the feeling
that the process is something like:

N. Test the vehicle.
   1.  Ship it to a dealer.
O. Analyze Test Results.
   1.  Get data from complaints department.
   2.  Show data to lawyers.
P. Take corrective Action
   1. If lawyers say we might get sued then
         give data to engineers
      else
         give data to marketing department
      end if

In fairness to GM, they're not the only ones!!!
In fairness to the automotive industry, they're not the only ones!!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)                                Office: 219-429-4923
Hughes Defense Communications (MS 10-40)                 Home: 219-471-7206
Fort Wayne,  IN   46808                  (Unix): wwgrol@pseserv3.fw.hac.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------