From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b44a149ee4e73a99
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Runtime check : what about you ?
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:56:06 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <960mlpFlctU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.vw7rxjtgule2fv@douda-yannick>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net QwwCqEqknt+Q8luTE/JtDAwPJAxaLVvYyLY7xB6Q9TTHznKaSj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aqKcvPBrbJs9Ulxib1sZxnintPU=
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328)
In-Reply-To: <op.vw7rxjtgule2fv@douda-yannick>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19913
Date: 2011-06-17T12:56:06+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Just out of curiosity as much as because this may be worth to discuss it 
> to some (at least because there are some reflex with that) : how many of 
> your typically compile releases with runtime check and how many of you 
> typically compile releases without runtime check ?

I release with runtime checks (-gnato -fstack-check, although I must 
sometimes omit the latter due to compile-time problems). This is a 
non-interactive, non-embedded, non-real-time application for PCs.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
       .      @       .