From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,43aafc250d42730f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-08 12:15:41 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.isc.org!news.gnac.net!uunet!sac.uu.net!usenet.rational.com!not-for-mail From: "Mark Lundquist" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: controlled type in generic package? Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:58:59 -0800 Organization: Rational Software Message-ID: <95utvn$f9p$1@usenet.rational.com> References: <3A7FDA9A.C667090F@stn-atlas.de> <95p2ab$463$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <95q1fa$9e$1@usenet.rational.com> <95rpj5$gq7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <95sjs9$ral$1@wanadoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: ext-1235.rational.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5021 Date: 2001-02-08T11:58:59-08:00 List-Id: J.P.'s example is much better than the one I gave (in a followup to Lutz Donnerhacke), because it does not involve a dangling pointer. It shows that you would have a problem (beserk dispatching call) even though the object still exists. There would be a real problem with allowing an object to "outlive its own type"! Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote in message news:95sjs9$ral$1@wanadoo.fr... > >[...]