From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,adf721d80d71e381 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-07 12:10:07 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Ted Dennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [GNAT:GLIDE] Failure to compile Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 19:57:48 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <95s9bn$10e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <95s8lp$b4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130 X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Feb 07 19:57:48 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010109 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x63.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4946 Date: 2001-02-07T19:57:48+00:00 List-Id: In article <95s8lp$b4$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, aschw1309@my-deja.com wrote: > During a build the following occurs: > > - An error with the first withing statement in main says that > it can't find the all references in the with closure. I made > sure that all references exist and that all directories are > in the project file (.adp) and all mappings are in the > configuration file(.adc). Any idea what I can do about > this? It kills the build. The actual text of the error message (and the line it referrs to) might be helpful. > - One of the Rational libraries has a terminal '_' which > is rejected by GNAT. (/.../standard_.1.ada). Any idea Standard is a predefined Ada package that is supposed to come with all compilers, not some custom Rational package. You should certianly not be trying to compile any of Ada's predefined packages, as Gnat has its own versions (anyway, its illegal). Probably your best bet is going to be to not compile *any* Rational-supplied packages. Any errors you get due to missing facilities should be handled on a case-by-case basis. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/