From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cbd507df3efa824b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-05 19:30:11 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Help with Atomic_Components and whole array assignment Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 03:15:28 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <95nq8a$4ta$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <94hno6$p8s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A76E455.AABF2490@averstar.com> <9570vu$fv0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Feb 06 03:15:28 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x60.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4958 Date: 2001-02-06T03:15:28+00:00 List-Id: In article , kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) wrote: > One other thing that would sometimes be seen was going off > the end of an array purposely in order to reference a > variable in the calling program. And that of course is just clearly undefined code, so there is no way a compiler can guarantee to behave as expected for this kind of error. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/