From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,841c691ce18d157d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-02 15:04:22 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.isc.org!news.gnac.net!uunet!sac.uu.net!usenet.rational.com!not-for-mail From: "Mark Lundquist" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: discussion group: Ada use in Internet technologies Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:54:18 -0800 Organization: Rational Software Message-ID: <95fdqs$o3l$1@usenet.rational.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ext-3074.rational.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4895 Date: 2001-02-02T14:54:18-08:00 List-Id: Terry Westley wrote in message news:u6Ge6.2315$FZ1.358088@news.uswest.net... > Responses to my question as to whether there is any interest in a separate > forum for JVM target indicates that there is, but that the topic should > be broadened to include other Internet technologies than just compiling > Ada for the JVM. > > Now, I have more questions: > > 1) Do you prefer to: > a) Keep the discussions here in comp.lang.ada so as not to dilute this > newsgroup > b) Create a separate forum (my choice would be Yahoo Groups) > c) Create an ACM SIGAda working group with support from ACM > d) other? Well... C.L.A. is for discussing. A SIGAda working group is for working. There will be discussion, so you're going to have (a). And those kinds of discussions certainly do belong here on c.l.a. If there's something to work on, that's (b), but even then it doesn't obviate (a). Cheers! Mark