From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9f4b86e3d4cdde4e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-02 14:02:04 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!ppp-4-43.5800-6.access.uk.worldonline.COM!not-for-mail From: "Nick Roberts" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaXml API Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:03:12 -0000 Message-ID: <95fao5$h0g97$3@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> References: <95el2j$ee8$1@news.kiev.sovam.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-4-43.5800-6.access.uk.worldonline.com (62.64.156.43) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 981151302 17842471 62.64.156.43 (16 [25716]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4878 Date: 2001-02-02T22:03:12+00:00 List-Id: I have to say, Maxim, I am personally keener on DOM, if only for the ulterior reason that it is based on CORBA. A DOM-based parser may well be less efficient, but I think the trade-off for flexibility is worth it. Nevertheless, that's just my opinion :-) and I'd be interested in others'. -- Nick Roberts http://www.AdaOS.org "Maxim Reznik" wrote in message news:95el2j$ee8$1@news.kiev.sovam.com... Let's discuss SAX API for Ada ...