From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b0235b23a9db0f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-01 20:00:11 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be?
 (83, 95, ?)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 03:48:27 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <95dama$1gk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <mailman.979975693.13263.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <94c61v$h4a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <t6jeim807fic0a@corp.supernews.com>
 <94f9qf$dc4s7$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <94fdqb$u4b$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <94hr7f$oa0$1@usenet.rational.com> <3A76E923.318F7C1E@averstar.com>
 <95ctlj$ff437$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Feb 02 03:48:27 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4840
Date: 2001-02-02T03:48:27+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <95ctlj$ff437$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>,
  "Nick Roberts" <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
> PS: Yes I realise that there's not going to be a revision so
> this kind of idle speculation is pointless, and yes I realise
> people with nohing better to do ;-) will have a field day
> picking it apart. Sigh.

This is a misconception, no one could say at this stage when
the next revision of the Ada standard might be, but in any case
well conceived proposals can be considered as amendment AI's
by the ARG right now, without waiting for a new revision to be
in view. I will not comment on whether I consider this
particular proposal to be well conceived, I will leave that
to others.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/