From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.147.226 with SMTP id tn2mr47397053pab.42.1438257654413; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:00:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.104.147 with SMTP id a19mr625576qgf.2.1438257654368; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!f3no4886325igg.0!news-out.google.com!b31ni1335qge.0!nntp.google.com!69no2794805qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:00:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1438244919.17005.27.camel@obry.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.203.145.32; posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32 References: <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com> <014427b1-ff7a-4a69-82e6-0330af77ed96@googlegroups.com> <91f88d79-197c-419f-84a8-908e05967a2c@googlegroups.com> <135c2b00-d13c-4f5d-a586-8aca442d363b@googlegroups.com> <1438244919.17005.27.camel@obry.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <95caf1f5-e01e-4410-85ce-90bd917a110a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS? From: EGarrulo Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:00:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27199 Date: 2015-07-30T05:00:54-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 10:28:40 AM UTC+2, Pascal Obry wrote: > Le jeudi 30 juillet 2015 =E0 01:03 -0700, EGarrulo a =E9crit : > > That doesn't mean much. Ada doesn't offer any facility for > > automatic resource management, >=20 > Wrong! Please learn Ada first or we are going to have a very lengthly > discussion. No lenghty discussion! I know that enough Ada to be dangerous ;) Ada has = controlled types and finalization. The problem is that the standard leaves the=20 implementation of resource management as an exercise for the=20 reader, when we know that there are many pitfalls in=20 implementing resource management reliably.