From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e17a4d5bc0d42b86
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-01 08:30:11 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!63.208.208.143!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!novia!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: joswig@corporate-world.lisp.de
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM?
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 16:19:46 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <95c2ao$r1v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <RSCc6.1092$cD2.29078@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <m3k87e6i76.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com> <87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
 <m3zog7i84b.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.163.195.67
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Feb 01 16:19:46 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.76 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x63.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 194.163.195.67
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDjoswig
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4822
Date: 2001-02-01T16:19:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3zog7i84b.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>,
  Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> > The Python and Emacs VMs are quite widespread and platform independent
> > (the Emacs VM has probably been ported to more platforms than the
> > JVM).  And both support loading arbitrary bytecode (AFAIK, Perl does
> > not), so it's really possible to adapt an Ada compiler to this
> > platform.
>
> Last time I checked, the emacs "vm" was a lisp interpreter.

Look again. Emacs has a VM *and* a lisp interpreter.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/