From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e17a4d5bc0d42b86 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-01 04:05:56 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!newsfeed.online.be!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!warm.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.kvaerner.com!news@kvaerner.com From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:57:29 +0100 Organization: Kvaerner Group IT Message-ID: <95biv8$7i3@news.kvaerner.com> References: <94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 155.209.159.50 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2120.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2120.0 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4814 Date: 2001-02-01T12:57:29+01:00 List-Id: Ronald Cole wrote in message ... >Florian Weimer writes: >> The Python and Emacs VMs are quite widespread and platform independent >> (the Emacs VM has probably been ported to more platforms than the >> JVM). And both support loading arbitrary bytecode (AFAIK, Perl does >> not), so it's really possible to adapt an Ada compiler to this >> platform. > >Last time I checked, the emacs "vm" was a lisp interpreter. Why would >anyone want an Ada to emacs-lisp translator? To write Emacs code in Ada of course. Greetings,