From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d9eb594a33cb947 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-30 22:30:29 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: very specific question on Ada syntax Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:18:07 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <958ams$l1s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <9573c4$iav$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 31 06:18:07 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x54.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4740 Date: 2001-01-31T06:18:07+00:00 List-Id: In article <9573c4$iav$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > As expected, it doesn't handle it properly. Defininitely a > bug. It should be fixed in the next version. :-) I would definitely suggest looking through the source of scn.adb in GNAT to check on peculiarities of this kind. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/