From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e17a4d5bc0d42b86 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-30 11:30:30 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!193.190.198.17!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!mendelevium.btinternet.com!not-for-mail From: "Singlespeeder" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? ms .net vm Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:29:57 -0000 Organization: BT Internet Message-ID: <9574fi$4c2$1@uranium.btinternet.com> References: <94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: host62-7-87-64.btinternet.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4724 Date: 2001-01-30T19:29:57+00:00 List-Id: "Florian Weimer" wrote in message news:87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de... > (BTW: Will Microsoft make the .NET VM specification public? And if > they do, will they encourage third-party implementations?) So that we can play 'spot the difference' with the JVM specification :-) Nick