From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,48070c5a9289acfc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-29 22:30:08 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: TASKS and DIRECT_IO, weird data errors Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:21:21 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <955mgt$c61$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jan 30 06:21:21 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x52.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4685 Date: 2001-01-30T06:21:21+00:00 List-Id: In article , "squeaker" wrote: > i am really at a loss, to why when i copy from one file to another a > character at a time using direct_io i There is absolutely NO reason to think that Direct_IO can be used to create a literal copy of a file, and furthermore it is an appallingly inefficient way of doing things (see the recent thread on this subject - it has optimization in the subject line). Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/