From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!ncis.llnl.gov!afit-ab!wbralick
From: wbralick@afit-ab.arpa (William A. Bralick)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Unknown government training?
Message-ID: <950@afit-ab.arpa>
Date: 28 Feb 89 03:52:23 GMT
References: <8902280023.AA20727@rutgers.edu> <37413@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: wbralick@blackbird.afit.af.mil (William A. Bralick)
Distribution: na
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology; WPAFB, OH
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <37413@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Alan Beal <beal@cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:

>   I may have been premature in implying that the government isn't using ADA
>   at this time or isn't planning to use ADA in the future.  

Rest assured that the government has plenty of Air Defense Artillery units.
The ADA is certainly a critical element of our force structure.  This 
discussion is probably better suited to sci.military, though.

(I know, but I couldn't help myself :-)

Regards,

-- 
Will Bralick : wbralick@afit-ab.arpa  |  If we desire to defeat the enemy,
Air Force Institute of Technology,    |  we must proportion our efforts to 
                                      |  his powers of resistance.
with disclaimer;  use disclaimer;     |               - Carl von Clauswitz