From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9fd05e2c23c9c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-02 01:43:16 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MAS.ESCO.EUROCONTROL.BE!rou
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <9503020944.AA15308@MAS>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 1995 09:44:24 GMT
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
From: Olivier Rousseau <rou@MAS.ESCO.EUROCONTROL.BE>
Subject: Comparison and Communication between C++ and ADA
Comments: cc: rou@MAS.BITNET
Date: 1995-03-02T09:44:24+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello netter,

        I'm currently working on a project where we already use a toolbox
(written in C++) for the Graphical Interface.
        Some functionalities can't be developped using the toolbox (nothing to
do with graphics) and so have to be written in a programming language.
        We are currently trying to find out if we will use C++ or ADA for
these developpments.
        Does anybody knows about studies made on comparison between these two
languages considering we are already using C++ for the Graphical Interface and
that we want the result to be the more portable possible.

        Thanks for your help.

                        Olivier-Laurent ROUSSEAU