From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d9eb594a33cb947 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-27 16:41:58 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: very specific question on Ada syntax Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:32:02 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <94vpa2$lo4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <3A71FD83.281DFC3E@cadence.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jan 28 00:32:02 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x59.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4623 Date: 2001-01-28T00:32:02+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A71FD83.281DFC3E@cadence.com>, Paul Graham wrote: > I'm curious what the basis is for this reliance on attributes > being more than one character long. Well that's easy enough to see! It's easier to do it this way. > You don't check the preceding token's type to > determine if a character literal is allowed? Read the thread, I already posted the details of this approach. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/