From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,95c23095599677a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-22 08:20:11 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Optimization Question Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 16:15:08 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <94hma3$nnn$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <94ftfu$b59$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <94g431$ge3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <94hjbp$ks6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 22 16:15:08 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x64.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4309 Date: 2001-01-22T16:15:08+00:00 List-Id: In article <94hjbp$ks6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, Ted Dennison wrote: > My first iteration took the dumb approach and used Direct_IO > instantiated on bytes. By the way, this is even LESS portable than using Sequential_IO since it is even more likely that an implementation will add some control information to direct_io records. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/