From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b0235b23a9db0f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-22 07:11:28 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be?
 (83, 95, ?)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:02:21 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <94hi1m$jl1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <mailman.979975693.13263.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 22 15:02:21 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US;
 0.7) Gecko/20010109
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x61.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4301
Date: 2001-01-22T15:02:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <mailman.979975693.13263.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>,
  comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:
> I believe that at one time you mentioned the possibility of extending
> an enumerated type. This would greatly facilitate object oriented
> programming. For instance, I have created a Person_Names package. The

Why can't you use the class' tag for that purpose?

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/