From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95c23095599677a5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-21 18:12:02 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!63.208.208.143!feed2.onemain.com!feed1.onemain.com!feeder.qis.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Optimization Question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 01:57:56 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <94g431$ge3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <94ftfu$b59$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 22 01:57:56 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x65.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4291
Date: 2001-01-22T01:57:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <94ftfu$b59$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  dvdeug@my-deja.com wrote:

<<questions about speeding up code snipped>>

I am *amazed* that this is only ten times slower when the
I/O is done in such a perfectly gruesome manner (sequential
I/O instantiated on bytes).

It is elementary that you want to read big chunks of a file
at a time. What GNAT does is to read the entire source of
a program in one read statement.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/