From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b0235b23a9db0f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-21 13:12:48 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!not-for-mail
From: carroll@cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Carroll)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be?
 (83, 95, ?)
Date: 21 Jan 2001 21:12:46 GMT
Organization: Ohio State Univ., Dept of Computer and Information Science
Message-ID: <94fjce$mse$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu>
References: <mailman.979975693.13263.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <94f1ir$kkc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <94fbrp$iou$1@news.cis.ohio-state.edu>
 <94fd5s$tkh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: beta.cis.ohio-state.edu
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999)
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4277
Date: 2001-01-21T21:12:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <94fd5s$tkh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Robert Dewar  <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:
(snip)
>OK, what you posted did not illustrate type extension for these
>types, it just seemed to describe enumerated types, and the
>definition of subranges for these types.
(snip)

Doh - sorry, you're absolutely right - I didn't read the thread
carefully enough, and misunderstood things. Apologies for the
confusion.

-- Mark