From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b0235b23a9db0f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-21 11:50:10 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:37:47 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <94fdqb$u4b$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <94c61v$h4a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <94f9qf$dc4s7$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jan 21 19:37:47 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4276 Date: 2001-01-21T19:37:47+00:00 List-Id: In article <94f9qf$dc4s7$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>, "Nick Roberts" wrote: > I like this idea. It seems to me that it could be really useful sometimes > (enough to justify it). It also seems to me that there would be no major > implementation problem. It would require a number of changes and insertions > to the RM, but nothing drastic. Gets my vote. I assume you have studied the proposal in the mapping document and it is to this proposal that you are referring. If so, what new has happened that would justify reopening the discussion. Or do you have some additional technical insight here, i.e. a suggestion for modification of this proposal that would simplify it? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/