From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7332b19c66a79eea X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: AdaMagica Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Quantified Expressions: "some" Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:48:07 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <949be87b-78a2-4e7b-8b38-40f57a69eb55@d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> References: <4ce31bb6$0$7670$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <2d44ff4d-b3ad-4593-8492-4d16fb6b6a2e@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <1t7pvrh3i022d.8t9yqjonagar$.dlg@40tude.net> <4ce3e3c3$0$6987$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <13vas9njbsmps.1npsunlgz5n4z$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.156.44.178 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1290073687 25695 127.0.0.1 (18 Nov 2010 09:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.156.44.178; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; de; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008102920 Firefox/3.0.4,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16549 Date: 2010-11-18T01:48:07-08:00 List-Id: On 18 Nov., 09:47, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:12:53 -0600, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote in message > >news:puezn7v9naom.1nrc5rh8wzm7p.dlg@40tude.net... > >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:14:27 +0100, J-P. Rosen wrote: > > ... > >>> Actually, It's been decided recently to change "|" to "=>", so it will > >>> read: > >>> ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range => P(X) ) > > >> Not much better: "=>" means "implies." P is neither implied nor selected. > >> Actually it is antecedent, on the left side. IF kind of X, such that P(X) > >> AND X in the set, THEN something [ ELSE something ]. > > > "=>" is what SPARK uses. > > > I personally agreed with you and voted for neither. > > At least they could use "when" instead of "=>". ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range when P(X) ) ????? That's nonsense, it's the other way round (compare exit L when ... case X is when ...). If we are dreaming up syntax: Use a colon or double colon: ( for all X in 1 | 3..5 | F'Range :: P(X) )