From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,62c570a508b79271 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: amado.alves@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Symmetric matrices only! Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <94893f95-1e1e-4b91-a2ac-b57d47c57816@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> References: <2dfded9f-aa30-4b25-ba2b-6e0d7f6f0fab@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <33687f75-7666-47d4-a9b4-3b2e1b91eced@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.13.106.28 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208534102 31446 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2008 15:55:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.13.106.28; posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1 Safari/525.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20988 Date: 2008-04-18T08:55:02-07:00 List-Id: > "Moreover, the eigenvalues and vectors of > nonsymmetric, non-Hermitian matrices have been removed because of > potential > computational difficulties." (Barnes) > > I have no idea what all this means, but it doesn't sound silly to me. (Adam) Continues to sound silly to me (ok maybe not extremely;-) Yes for certain matrices the eigenproblem is hard, but there are methods to solve it satisfactorily for other certain matrices including large ones e.g. the "power method." And computing the determinant can also be very hard but the function is there! To use with caution!--which approach should extend to eigen. Hey, this reminds me, I think there is a way to solve eigen using determinants, so problem solved... if I had the library in the first place (GPL 2007 does not seem to have it)... arg!"#$%&/()=