From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,43bab14b56c5ac49
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-17 19:52:03 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT: warning: source alignment....
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 03:35:03 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <945o97$7l3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <979748441.912448@edh3>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 18 03:35:03 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x57.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4137
Date: 2001-01-18T03:35:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <979748441.912448@edh3>,
  Frode Tenneboe <ft@alne.edh.ericsson.se> wrote:
> In lack of a GNAT specific list, here goes:
>
> I get the following warnings from some legacy code when
compilled with GNAT
> 3.12p:
>
> eh_uif.adb:112:45: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_WordRec" (2)
> eh_uif.adb:113:45: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_LongRec" (4)
> eh_uif.adb:119:47: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_WordRec" (2)
> eh_uif.adb:120:47: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_LongRec" (4)
> eh_uif.adb:163:45: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_WordRec" (2)
> eh_uif.adb:164:45: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_LongRec" (4)
> eh_uif.adb:238:47: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_WordRec" (2)
> eh_uif.adb:239:47: warning: source alignment (1) < alignment
of "T_LongRec" (4)

These warnings are definitely appropriate for the given code.
We have found this particular warning VERY helpful in porting
legacy code.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/