From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.software-eng:1158 comp.lang.ada:2065
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!noao!arizona!mike
From: mike@arizona.edu (Mike Coffin)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Good Design Strategies <Was comments on comments>
Message-ID: <9443@megaron.arizona.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 89 17:07:46 GMT
References: <4574@hubcap.UUCP>
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>From article <4574@hubcap.UUCP> (William Thomas Wolfe,2847,):
>    I stand by my statement regarding Eiffel's flakiness.

Do you mean that the language design is flakey, or that an
implementation is flakey?  If the former, what is flakey about it?
-- 
Mike Coffin				mike@arizona.edu
Univ. of Ariz. Dept. of Comp. Sci.	{allegra,cmcl2}!arizona!mike
Tucson, AZ  85721			(602)621-2858