From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!think!linus!community-chest!mitchell From: mitchell@community-chest.uucp (George Mitchell) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 10 Commandments for Ada9X Summary: So ... ? Message-ID: <94347@linus.UUCP> Date: 6 Feb 90 16:32:02 GMT References: <9002021545.AA03784@ctc.contel.com> Sender: news@linus.UUCP Reply-To: gitchel@mitre.org (George Mitchell) Organization: MITRE-McLean Software Engineering Laboratory List-Id: In article <9002021545.AA03784@ctc.contel.com> mathis@CTC.CONTEL.COM (Bob Mathis x4232) wrote: `1. PUBLIC .... `2. CONSERVATIVE .... `9. STRICT CONFORMANCE .... `10. KEEP IT ADA .... The Ada9X effort has been underway for some time. Do any of the above "command" some kind of change to the way they have been working? `3. ISO .... `4. OOP .... `5. REAL-TIME .... `6. RELIABLE .... `7. INTERFACES .... `8. SIMPLIFY/UNIFY .... Were any of the above supported by submissions to Ada9X? If not, why are you raising the issues now? If so, do you have reason to believe that they require greater consideration than you expect them to receive? -- /s/ George vmail: 703/883-6029 email: mitchell@community-chest.mitre.org [alt: gmitchel@mitre.arpa] snail: GB Mitchell, MITRE, MS Z676, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA 22102