From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,75a8a3664688f227
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-16 04:30:03 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!teaser.fr!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!unlisys!news.snafu.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de!sb463ba
From: sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de (Georg Bauhaus)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Parameter Modes, In In Out and Out
Date: 16 Jan 2001 12:22:29 GMT
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <941ee5$nbo$2@news-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <Zmt56.57012$ca6.937797@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <7Cx56.90736$A06.3322588@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com>
 <937jab$s23$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A57CD7F.2228BFD5@brighton.ac.uk>
 <938p3u$omv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93cagm$c1j$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93e4e6$ucg$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93encq$brm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
	<93f6ar$m44$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93flab$2mh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93fqau$6m2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93h9mo$bbm$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93il87$iqo$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93k6dv$qt6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93ko49$auq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93modu$36k$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93n2co$alq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4051
Date: 2001-01-16T12:22:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar (robert_dewar@my-deja.com) wrote:

: If science to you is strictly restricted to things that can
: be objectively measured

O.K. whatever "objectively" might mean objectively
(yes, I know the model ;/).


: and test the theories by experimentation. According to this
: definitely, ...
: for sure social science
: etc are not sciences either

Please, I'm suprised, no such unsupportable claims from someone
who uses to require arguments.  I'm not sure what exact notion of
social science etc. you have, but I know one notion usually held
up by engineers and nat. "scientist",  about soft/hard, exact/inexact
etc sciences  that is largely based on ignorance and aquired blind spots
(anologous to "Ada is dead").

But that's OT on cla, of course

Georg Bauhaus