From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-06 17:17:48 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VNET.IBM.COM!vinall Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM News-Software: UReply 3.1 Message-ID: <9412070053.AA05549@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 16:49:43 PST Sender: Ada programming language From: Paige Vinall Organization: PL/I Development, IBM Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada? Comments: To: info-ada@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu Date: 1994-12-06T16:49:43-08:00 List-Id: The official name is PL/I (as specified by the ANSI standards). It stands for "Programming Language One". The "I" is a roman numeral. Using an arabic one is incorrect. Before PL/I, it was briefly called NPL for "New Programming Language" but the acronym conflicted with Net Propulsion Laboratory. "PL/1" is incorrect but used so heavily that I don't bother correcting people. Paige Vinall - PL/I Development Manager, IBM Internet: vinall@vnet.ibm.com, Phone: (408) 463-2106