From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-06 05:08:04 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VNET.IBM.COM!vinall Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM News-Software: UReply 3.1 Message-ID: <9412061309.AA02026@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 05:06:07 PST Sender: Ada programming language From: Paige Vinall Organization: PL/I Development, IBM Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada? Comments: To: info-ada@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu Date: 1994-12-06T05:06:07-08:00 List-Id: In INFO-ADA Digest - 5 Dec 1994 (item 11)No. Michael Feldman writes: >Yes. > >But unless I mis-read the post from the IBM chap the other day, >ISUB does more than logically swap the indices, it actually >transposes the array. I don't think I kept that post, but I do >think that's what he said. > If an ISUB dfined array is passed to a procedure, PL/I will compute an image of it. >Has PL/1 supported ISUB all along? I do not remember it from my >PL/1 days 20 or so years ago. I think so. Paige Vinall - PL/I Development Manager, IBM Internet: vinall@vnet.ibm.com, Phone: (408) 463-2106