From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fe2aecddaa6badba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-17 16:38:44 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!HUACHUCA-EMH17.ARMY.MIL!sizemore Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Message-ID: <9411171208.A04713@huachuca-emh17.army.mil> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 12:08:47 MST Sender: Ada programming language From: Nick Sizemore Subject: Re: Let's cover this one more time... Date: 1994-11-17T12:08:47-07:00 List-Id: In response to: > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 15:35:40 EST > From: CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM > Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93 > Subject: Let's cover this one more time... I am aware of reverse engineering/conversion tools from: Scandura - PRODOC re/Nu FORTRAN-Ada WorkBench Reasoning Systems - REFINE/ series McCabe Associates - (don't recall tool name). There are others, but these are some I have seen in various literature sources for several years, so I assume they have had some commercial success. I have not used these but have aquired literature for others in my organization. Is there some reason, either in priciple or in practice, why such tools (as opposed to the line by line 'converters') are out of the question for the project described? I do know of at least one company locally which used the McCabe tools to re-engineer an Ada system (i.e., no conversion) and was pleased with the results. Just asking - I have no vested interest. +------------------------------+---------------------------------+ |N. L. Sizemore | (602) 538-4883 [Voice] | |Computer Sciences Corporation | (602) 538-4933 [FAX] | |P. O. Box 719 | sizemore@huachuca-emh17.army.mil| |Ft. Huachuca, AZ 85613-0719 | | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | "For aggregate success, members must be the same to the | | system and different to the environment." | | | | Second Aggregate Law in General Principles of | | System Design | | Gerald & Daniela Weinberg | +----------------------------------------------------------------+