From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebb3574ca8067275
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-02 14:24:17 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!EUROCONTROL.DE!wel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <9411020753.AA11444@eurocontrol.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 1994 08:53:25 +0100
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
From: Bob Wells #402 <wel@EUROCONTROL.DE>
Subject: Re: Access type representations.
Date: 1994-11-02T08:53:25+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

G'day,
Thanks for all the responses to my question concerning alternative
representations of access type. It inded makes me realize my mistake
in simply using access types to interface to C pointers.
Once again thanks for the responses (both publicly to the list and
privately to me).
Bob W. (-: