From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf43a183ce108291
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-08 15:14:47 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!slsv6bt!slbh01.bln.sel.alcatel.de!rcvie!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!EUROCONTROL.DE!wel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <9409081234.AA07258@eurocontrol.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 1994 14:34:55 +0200
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
From: Bob Wells #402 <wel@EUROCONTROL.DE>
Subject: Re: Government Policy on Ada Acquisitions
Comments: To: INFO-ADA%NDSUVM1.BITNET@vm.gmd.de
Date: 1994-09-08T14:34:55+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jim Dorman/Thomes <aetechca@powergrid.electriciti.com> wrote:

> What will be the benefits of the proliferation of free non-
> validated, partially implemented, non-supported, un-maintained Ada
> compilers and libraries? I believe we can logically expect the
> same kind of razor-sharp support from NYU as we get from the Post
> Office.
>

G'day,
All I can say is that after getting two copies of your demo disk, both
of which didn't work, I not so sure about the razor-sharp support found
in *some* non-socialist compiler vendors.
Bob W. (-:

P.S. Didn't **anyone** out there have any ideas about my 'Image
problem? (Integer'Image that is!! ) Thanks for your input Tim C.