From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,447bd1cf7a88c198
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-11 02:12:05 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-feed.riddles.org.uk!freenix!oleane.net!oleane!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: n_brunot@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Do we need "Mission-Critical" software? Was: What to Do?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:00:49 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <93k08f$m9v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3A4F5A4A.9ABA2C4F@chicagonet.net> <3A4F759E.A7D63F3F@netwood.net>
 <3A50ABDF.3A8F6C0D@acm.org> <92qdnn$jfg$1@news.huji.ac.il>
 <3A50C371.8B7B871@home.com> <3A51EC04.91353CE7@uol.com.br>
 <3A529C97.2CA4777F@home.com> <3A53CB9E.EA7CF86C@uol.com.br>
 <3A5466DE.811D43A5@acm.org> <932aol$ikc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <932mi6$r2k$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <9343b1$3g5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <934iuf$eqv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <umq1yuixba0.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>
 <937kc7$ssq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93c0e9$4u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93e33l$tfu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93ekmo$a14$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93f73f$mt1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93fd9v$s03$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93fpth$697$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93hi4f$hcu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93ikl3$i6v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.27.47.150
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 11 10:00:49 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x66.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 212.27.47.150
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDn_brunot
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3901
Date: 2001-01-11T10:00:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <93ikl3$i6v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote:

> Perhaps there is a language problem here, go back and reread
> the posts.
<snip>
> Sorry, that's too far from being a parsable english sentence
> to be comprehensible, perhaps you could write it in French and
> we would have a better shot at understanding what you are
> trying to say.

You extremely often see language problems everywhere :-)
Most of the english spoken in the world is even worse than that and
everybody understands :-)
I could make an long list of native english people who actually wonder
if you read things before answering, and see nothing in common between
short and clear questions and your more than lengthy and unrelated
answers ... :-)

May be communication problems between you and a great part of the rest
of the world is a more appropriate explanation than language problems :-
)



Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/