From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,447bd1cf7a88c198
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-10 13:58:02 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Do we need "Mission-Critical" software? Was: What to Do?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 21:36:36 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <93ikl3$i6v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3A4F5A4A.9ABA2C4F@chicagonet.net> <3A4F759E.A7D63F3F@netwood.net>
 <3A50ABDF.3A8F6C0D@acm.org> <92qdnn$jfg$1@news.huji.ac.il>
 <3A50C371.8B7B871@home.com> <3A51EC04.91353CE7@uol.com.br>
 <3A529C97.2CA4777F@home.com> <3A53CB9E.EA7CF86C@uol.com.br>
 <3A5466DE.811D43A5@acm.org> <932aol$ikc$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <932mi6$r2k$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <9343b1$3g5$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <934iuf$eqv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <umq1yuixba0.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>
 <937kc7$ssq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93c0e9$4u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93e33l$tfu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93ekmo$a14$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93f73f$mt1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93fd9v$s03$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <93fpth$697$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93hi4f$hcu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Wed Jan 10 21:36:36 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x57.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3876
Date: 2001-01-10T21:36:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <93hi4f$hcu$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  n_brunot@my-deja.com wrote:
> For all the rest, I suggest you seriously consider updating
> your time scale notions of what's going on in modern
> softwares :-)

Perhaps there is a language problem here, go back and reread
the posts. The point of introducing JOVIAL had nothing to do
with "modern softare", quite the contrary: I was giving an
example of a language that had pretty much died out but which
was once used reasonably widely.

> I thought first Gnat versions much younger but anyway highly
> obsolete :-

Sorry, that's too far from being a parsable english sentence
to be comprehensible, perhaps you could write it in French and
we would have a better shot at understanding what you are
trying to say.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/