From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-08 20:34:38 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and Database
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 04:23:46 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <93e3oe$tt6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101081452530.27577-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Jan 09 04:23:46 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x66.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3792
Date: 2001-01-09T04:23:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article
<Pine.LNX.4.10.10101081452530.27577-100000@lexis.di.fct.unl.pt>
,
  comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Robert Dewar wrote:
> > compatibility is defined as a license that does not "impose
any further
> > restrictions". Yes the GPL is compatible with itself in
this sense, but
> > it is also compatible with any less restrictive license.
>
> Hmmm... So a license slightly more restrictive than GPL may
be compatible
> with GPL.

No, that's false (perhaps there is a language problem, but
the sentence you quote from me is quite incompatible with
your conclusion).


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/