From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3fa322e453b2f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-08 07:34:06 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!codeine.org!feed.cgocable.net!xfer13.netnews.com!netnews.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Ted Dennison Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: www.adahome.com?... Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:17:17 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <93cllj$l01$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <92dod3$vno$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A57C029.6BC5A685@brighton.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.48.27.130 X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 08 15:17:17 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001207 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x72.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.48.27.130 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDtedennison Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3777 Date: 2001-01-08T15:17:17+00:00 List-Id: In article <3A57C029.6BC5A685@brighton.ac.uk>, John English wrote: > Ted Dennison wrote: > > If I remember correctly, his rationale for copyrighting the FAQ was > > something along the lines that he wanted to prevent hostile forking > > of the FAQ. However, he also took care to require his permission for > > just about any commercial distribution of it. The LRM copyright > > seems to just have been a crass commercial act (he offers to sell > > his HTML FAQ on the site, and the licensing terms seem to be crafted > > to prevent you from legally acquiring a copy any other way). > > Hmm. Having asked Marcus for permission to redistribute the FAQs (and > receiving this without any quibbles), and then having spoken via email > and finally meeting him F2F at Ada Europe some years back, I'm > inclined to be dubious about any implied mercenary motives. Marcus did I'm sorry, I typed "FAQ" at the end, when I meant to type LRM. Replace the last "FAQ" in the above paragraph with "LRM". The rest is what I meant to say. Given the Magnus/Marcus thing, I'm sure you'll understand. :-) I don't think we are in disagreement at all. -- T.E.D. http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/