From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fb992,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb992,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-07 23:51:50 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!news.iac.net!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: aotto2@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.visual.basic,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Free-NET
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 07:36:17 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <93bqlh$4v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <93a584$n84$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A58AFF3.C67CAB11@bigfoot.de>
 <pGb66.50017$xW4.399646@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.194.7.77
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 08 07:36:17 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.06 [en] (WinNT; I ;Nav)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 193.194.7.77
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDaotto2
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.smalltalk:6011
 comp.lang.visual.basic:1052 comp.lang.pascal.misc:1095 comp.lang.ada:3763
Date: 2001-01-08T07:36:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



Hi,

  the goal is the time you have to spend to write such an extension,
  The CO-Process based implementation taks some days, the full
  native implementation in TCL would take weeks or months.
  ( just remember how difficult it is to write an DB wrapper for
    a language )

  on of the main features is that you write the CO-Process one
  time and can reuse it for every language again and this is an
  big improvement.


mfg

  aotto :)




> This looks really dumb (or is it just me?) why can't you use the
commands
> with out giveing them to some server? is this a really dodgy multi
threading
> with out multi threadding?(sort of the art of fighting with out
fighting? :)
>
> also what is this .net crud that is the "new" buzzword.. some one
mentioned
> it.. and I can't remember what he said :) some thing about a new
message que
> to replace interprocess communications or some thing? but it's for
multi
> computers or some thing?
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/