From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fb992,2dc0a43481058921
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb992,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-07 23:43:40 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!216.218.236.179.MISMATCH!news!news.he.net!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.gblx.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: aotto2@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.visual.basic,comp.lang.pascal.misc,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Free-NET
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 07:30:49 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <93bqba$vqh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <93a584$n84$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A58AFF3.C67CAB11@bigfoot.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.194.7.77
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Jan 08 07:30:49 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.06 [en] (WinNT; I ;Nav)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x54.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 193.194.7.77
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDaotto2
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.smalltalk:6010
 comp.lang.visual.basic:1051 comp.lang.pascal.misc:1094 comp.lang.ada:3762
Date: 2001-01-08T07:30:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> Yes, but how does this have anything to do with Microsoft .NET?
> Interfacing different languages via a message queue thru stdin/stdout?
I
> do not understand how you can compare that with Microsoft's .NET
> technology. The core of .NET is the Common Language Runtime, and there
> is already a competitor for this: it's called the Java platform :-)
> Please elaborate on how you plan to implement a .NET equivalent.
>
> Gerhard H�ring
>
> aotto2@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >   after Mirosoft create .NET , it's time to answer
> >
> >   have a look to:
> >
> >     http://home.t-online.de/home/aotto/mqcon_E.html
> >
> >   to read more about it
>

Hi,

  you arr right, MqCon isn't the answer its the way MqCon was written
    ==> CO-Process
  MqCon is just an example on how to glue together "MqSeries" with
  TCL based on the CO-Process architecture

mfg

  aotto :)



Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/