From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9de425d0eee7b58
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does GNAT GPL 2010 have C++?
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <93a65872-09bc-43e0-8e89-802608943810@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <4cd34172-9a48-4679-b4c6-ebf3793e3328@p22g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <1c84d9d4-2d55-4a73-8fb5-fb060e0f55c1@l17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.172.180.108
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1284622508 22633 127.0.0.1 (16 Sep 2010 07:35:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:35:08 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.172.180.108;
 posting-account=x5rpZwoAAABMN2XPwcebPWPkebpwQNJG
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US)
 AppleWebKit/531.21.8+(KHTML, like Gecko,
 Safari/528.16) OmniWeb/v622.11.0,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14103
Date: 2010-09-16T00:35:08-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sep 16, 12:20=A0am, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 Wrz, 08:47, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
>
> >http://libre.adacore.com/libre/tools/gnat-gpl-edition/
>
> > the 2010 GPL GNAT includes Ada, C, and C++. Yet, there is this on my
> > OS X 10.5:
>
> It was similar with 2009. Interestingly, the package for Windows does
> have the g++
> part (or at least it did for 2009 - is it still true for 2010?).
>
> I think that plain sloppiness is the only explanation for this
> inconsistency.
> Although the fact that it happens again is a food for thought.
>
> --
> Maciej Sobczak *http://www.inspirel.com
>
> YAMI4 - Messaging Solution for Distributed Systemshttp://www.inspirel.com=
/yami4

Well, that's not good news. It's preventing me from building PLplot on
OS X 10.5.

I wonder if we'll have to wait another year for a fix?