From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa6a10d52c572554 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-07 08:02:05 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gtk + gtkada shaky? Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 15:49:21 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <93a35v$lq4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <937vpi$5i5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jan 07 15:49:21 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3747 Date: 2001-01-07T15:49:21+00:00 List-Id: In article , randhol+abuse@pvv.org (Preben Randhol) wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 16:57:12 -0500, Jesse Farmer wrote: > >Win98 SE cleanly installed > ^^^^^ > > Well here is your problem then. The GTK+ port for windows isn't so good > yet. Also, the emphasis has been on Win NT and Win 2K so far, where we have been getting pretty favorable reports (few of our users mess with Win98 at this stage, since we have found it to be quite unstable for development purposes). After all even Microsoft claims that Win2K is 14 times as reliable as Win98 :-) [that's from a big recent advertising campaign] Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/