From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!elroy!devvax!rich From: rich@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Inheritance and Ada Message-ID: <939@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> Date: 29 Dec 87 15:28:57 GMT References: <8712281731.AA27872@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> Reply-To: rich@devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit) Followup-To: comp.lang.ada Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA. Keywords: Ada,censorship Summary: Don't censor it if it's Ada List-Id: In article <8712281731.AA27872@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu> MFELDMAN@GWUVM.BITNET (Mike Feldman) writes: > >Well, friends, how would _you_ like it to be? Indeed, I think that it's the case that in the best interest of the people who read this group, who are mostly professionals, that these sort of articles should appear. As noted, even though the articles in the mod2 news group tend to be a little commercial, it gives those people who have bought the products that these companies are advertising a chance for rebuttal. This allows both sides of the sheet to be aired as it were. I'd hate to think that one of the blows against Ada is from one of its own constituents. My vote here for less censorship. -- rich@devvax.jpl.nasa.gov "Generality up the ying yang. That's the way to go."