From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e2dcaf2dcc1f70d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.71.90.67.MISMATCH!news.unit0.net!news.osn.de!diablo1.news.osn.de!news2.arglkargh.de!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
From: Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Using gnat & ncurses
References: <Xns9D3CACDFB7F84WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.245>
Message-ID: <938a6efb4f04eececb1934844199fa16@dizum.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:45:18 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10620
Date: 2010-03-18T14:45:18+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com> wrote:

> It just occurred to me that there was some sort 
> of Ada binding in ncurses IIRC. Has anyone here 
> had any experience with it?  Maybe that would
> circumvent this main program annoyance among other
> things.

I have used it and I was very impressed with it, Juergen did a bang-up job
in my opinion. It's not completely faithful to ncurses in that some of the
functions are implemented (and work) very differently, but I think, better,
than the C version. Definitely worth trying.