From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY, MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,75a8a3664688f227 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-06 09:20:09 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!nntp1.njy.teleglobe.net!teleglobe.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Parameter Modes, In In Out and Out Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 17:06:23 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <937jab$s23$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <7Cx56.90736$A06.3322588@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Jan 06 17:06:23 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3702 Date: 2001-01-06T17:06:23+00:00 List-Id: In article <7Cx56.90736$A06.3322588@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com>, tmoran@acm.org wrote: > > An out parameter is still taken in. > No, actually, it is not. This is false information. In many instances, outlined clearly in the RM, the questioner is right, an IN OUT parameter and an OUT parameter are identical. Yes, from a conceptual documentation point of view, if you use OUT, then you should not read the parameter, but the RM is quite clear that this in many cases this is just a documentation convention and nothing more. This is true for all by-reference types, and in particular, for all tagged types OUT is exactly the same as IN OUT semantically. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/