From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e81fa53486a4934
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m17g2000prl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marcelo_Cora=E7a_de_Freitas?= <marcelo.batera@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is your preferred VCS?
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <93564a8d-8ddb-42cb-a873-dc80f6773c25@m17g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <24890919-000d-4b75-8556-0585e8a2f59d@g21g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
	<a1bca3fc-c324-4385-87db-d3b3d626aee4@i18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
	<Xns9DC5672C6850WarrensBlatherings@81.169.183.62>
 <87k4odxcuz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<4c52f115$0$6893$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4c530d7a$0$10185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
	<c2d1dfc9-d56f-43ed-b109-305c97f61afe@l17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
	<87hbjewshs.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.168.77.219
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1280766094 714 127.0.0.1 (2 Aug 2010 16:21:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:21:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m17g2000prl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=200.168.77.219;
	posting-account=NclPyQoAAAAE3vS1fHd_8NOSumP9W3Ey
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4
	(KHTML, like Gecko) Sabayon Chrome/5.0.375.99 Safari/533.4,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12803
Date: 2010-08-02T09:21:34-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 1 ago, 07:13, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> This looks like the memory leak that was fixed in monotone version 0.27,
> back in 2006. =A0And the latest version, 0.48, has additional performance
> improvements for very large trees.

I am not quite sure we are talking about the same bug. This has been
detected in 2009/2010 and the Edward O'Callaghan from AuroraUX was in
touch with one of the monotone developers. I don't know exactly what
happened as I had to focus on other things.