From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac193220dd94f402 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-04 06:50:20 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.mesh.ad.jp!news.tele.dk!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: Robert Dewar Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and Database Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:43:58 GMT Organization: Deja.com Message-ID: <93227b$agb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jan 04 14:43:58 2001 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x52.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3652 Date: 2001-01-04T14:43:58+00:00 List-Id: In article , randhol+abuse@pvv.org (Preben Randhol) wrote: > As I recall last time I checked this, the license was not free in the > sense that it is compatible with the GPL. But I don't know if that has > changed. Why should GPL compatibility be an issue for runtime stuff? Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/