From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 27 Jun 93 01:03:55 GMT
From: ucivax!gateway@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Kenneth Anderson)
Subject: Re: Ada Operators in 9x
Message-ID: <9306261803.aa04612@Paris.ics.uci.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In comp.lang.ada you write:

>In article <1993Jun25.211211.231@seas.gwu.edu> mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael 
Feldman) writes:

>   Suppose you _meant_ to write "q := 35;" but instead hit the shift
>   key accidentally and wrote "Q := 35;"

>Then you'd be doubly dumb.  Once for declaring "q" and "Q" in the same
>block and twice for being sloppy about typing.

You can't really mean the latter.  A person is "dumb" if they make
a typing mistake? I think you are arguing just for the sake of arguing...

Ken