From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 29 Mar 93 10:44:34 EST From: Larry iummo <75570.2443@CompuServe.COM> Subject: Rep clause problems on VADS Message-ID: <930329154433_75570.2443_EHA28-1@CompuServe.COM> List-Id: We're using the Verdix (Sun) Ada compiler on a SPARCstation and VADSwork 68030 cross-compiler targeted to a MVME-147/143 network sending inter-processor messages via sockets between the SPARC and the 68k netwok. We send quite a few variant records across the network that we have used rep clauses in to align the fields properly. It work fine on message that do not containt variantparts.When variant parts are used, the 68k seems to ignore the designated byte layout specified by the rep clauses. We have heard that they(the "at" clause) may be ignored on the VADSworks side. Has anyone experienced this problem. Thanks in advance. Larry Ciummo at ESC Cor., Middletown, RI