From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ffe7b9269a00c843,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-15 09:02:47 PST
Path: 
 sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!MANTA.NOSC.MIL!mshapiro
From: mshapiro@MANTA.NOSC.MIL (Michael D Shapiro)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada cost breakpoints (was Re: Air Force helping to undermine Ada)
Message-ID: <9303151702.AA01402@manta.nosc.mil>
Date: 15 Mar 93 17:02:47 GMT
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Date: 1993-03-15T17:02:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Bob Munck recently wrote:

> Ada is mandated by DoD because a program that uses it cost less over
> its full life cycle.  The larger the program and the longer the life
> cycle, the higher the percentage saved.

This implies to me that for smaller programs with shorter life
cycles, Ada might cost more to use over the full life cycle.
Certainly a 23-line reformatting utility to be used one time and
discarded thirteen minutes later can probably be written in
SNOBOL4 or ICON (or even AWK) more cheaply than in Ada.  Has
anyone done a study to find these breakpoints?  One pair I've
heard mentioned as the appropriate minima for Ada are 500K
source lines of delivered code and/or seven years life cycle.

================================================================
Michael D. Shapiro, Ph.D.              e-mail: mshapiro@nosc.mil
NCCOSC RDT&E Division (NRaD) Code 411    San Diego CA 92152-7560
Voice: (619) 553-4080     FAX: (619) 553-4808      DSN: 553-4080
 [Until January 1992 we were Naval Ocean Systems Center (NOSC)]