From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1014db,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 101deb,dea70f96af442ea2 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 103376,232e89dd4cc3c154 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid9ef9b79ae9,gid4516fb5702,gidbda4de328f,gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Marni Zollinger Newsgroups: sci.math,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: KISS4691, a potentially top-ranked RNG. Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:38:50 -0600 Message-ID: <92ulnaFo70U1@mid.individual.net> References: <4dae2a4b$0$55577$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <4db90113$0$77724$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <91ukucFq9cU2@mid.individual.net> <91uoesFq9cU3@mid.individual.net> <92mrrbF3haU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net yCU4HlbjsPHXLw78mJbA2gHeQahBdwIbDJ+UESqSjB6uKLbYal Cancel-Lock: sha1:caSjj9f0ERdIsTFiGPpCRjDgKio= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 In-Reply-To: <92mrrbF3haU1@mid.individual.net> Xref: g2news2.google.com sci.math:235945 comp.lang.c:127337 comp.lang.fortran:42416 comp.lang.pl1:2509 comp.lang.ada:20193 Date: 2011-05-10T23:38:50-06:00 List-Id: On 05/08/2011 01:34 AM, Uno wrote: > On 4/28/2011 8:09 PM, Ian Collins wrote: >> The context was integral types, I didn't want to venture anywhere near >> VLAs on a cross-post! >> > > So Ian, > > I wouldn't mind hearing your thoughts about corruption and empires. Are > they the same thing? > > But to be topical, I thought I might re-write george in fortran, using > the ISO_C_BINDING. > > Attended the first funeral after my dad's today. Oh my goodness, you can't re-write george in these here united states. -- mz